The Nyéléni Global Forum (2025)

The world is in unprecedented turmoil, and we are all facing deep-rooted overlapping crises. We need a paradigm shift to reclaim the right to shape our own food systems for the well-being of people and the planet.

Launched in 1996 at the World Food Summit, food sovereignty promotes a people-focused approach to food systems, prioritizing locally produced, stable, healthy, and affordable food over dependence on global markets and neoliberal policies.

The International Nyéléni Forum in Mali (2007) established this vision as a global standard, uniting movements and organizations dedicated to food sovereignty and social justice. In 2015, the Nyéléni International Forum on Agroecology reinforced this,
placing peasant, indigenous, family agroecology at the centre of a strategy for addressing climate and biodiversity crises.

That is why the Nyéléni Global Forum are calling for a new mobilization within and beyond the food sovereignty movement, to build our response at both global and local levels, and tighten alliances with climate justice, antiracism, health, labour, feminist, and social and solidarity economy movements and organisations. Through a multi-year process, they’ve brought together thousands of grassroots organizations and other allies across six world regions, to discuss and put forward joint proposals for a system change and a strong political agenda for the years to come.

The Nyéléni Global Forum, to be held in 2025 in India, will be the space for strategy and organization, and to kick off this new phase of the food sovereignty movement.

These can be ideal spaces for D-Ns to get involved with either during or between events in Food Councils or other collaborations. Click through to find the organizations near you who are involved.

School Meals Coalition. (2021 website)

The School Meals Coalition is a prominent and innovative vehicle for multilateral action and addresses multiple Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) outcomes. The School Meals Coalition is a government-led and partner-supported effort that aims at ensuring that by 2030 every child worldwide can receive a healthy meal in school. Led by Brazil, Finland, and France, the Coalition was one of the most impactful and successful initiatives coming out of the UN Food Systems Summit in 2021.

The Coalition is an example of a new generation of multilateralism; It’s about governments and partners agreeing to join forces and work together to improve the quality, sustainability, and scale of national school meals programmes and complementary interventions. It is about breaking silos and pooling resources – best practices, experience, information, and technical support. Through its multisectoral and holistic approach, the Coalition addresses implementation bottlenecks, strengthens evidence for decision-making, provides opportunities for improved coordination and generates the political will and buy-in needed for change through advocacy.

Besides food provision (SDG 2), school meal programs boost agriculture, create jobs, increase school attendance and learning, and enhance health. They function as in-kind cash transfers, promoting social stability, gender equity, and comprehensive social protection efforts. Additionally, school meals programmes can integrate complementary interventions, including WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene), nutrition education, and other routine school health and nutrition services.

School meals represent a powerful, multisectoral tool, which can contribute to achieving multiple Sustainable Development Goals, including poverty (SDG1), hunger (SDG2), health (SDG3), education (SDG4), gender equality (SDG5), economic growth (SDG8), reduced inequalities (SDG10), Responsible consumption and production (SDG12), climate action (SDG13) and strengthened partnerships (SDG17).

To achieve this member states have set three objectives:

  1. Restore all national school meal programmes lost to the pandemic by 2023
  2. Reach the 73 million most vulnerable children who were not reached even prior to the pandemic by 2030
  3. Improve the quality and efficiency of school health and nutrition programmes globally by 2030

2025 January

Planet-friendly school meals: opportunities to improve children’s health and leverage change in food systems (2024)

Pastorino, S., et al. (2024, November 18). Planet-friendly school meals: Opportunities to improve children’s health and leverage change in food systems. The Lancet Planetary Healthhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00302-4

Planet-friendly school meals, defined as programmes delivering equitable and healthy foods for children, produced in ways that do not pollute or overexploit natural resources and protect biodiversity, are a platform to tackle many food system challenges.

Multiple stakeholder collaborations are required to move towards planet-friendly school meals. This entails changes directed at two sets of policies as outlined in the Planet-friendly school meals conceptual framework (figure): those making immediate changes to school meal programmes; and those developing demand-driven planet-friendly procurement policies that promote ecological farming and develop sustainable regional food systems.

School meals, mostly state-funded, reach 418 million children every day worldwide offering an opportunity to improve diet quality, and ultimately nutrition and health, and act as a catalyst for food systems transformation contributing to meeting global climate, food, and biodiversity goals.

2025 January

Good Practices in School Gardens and School Meals: Africa, Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean (2024)

As part of food and nutrition education actions and a component of Sustainable Schools, the Programme encourages school garden initiatives, considering their potential to transform food habits of current and future generations, training students to be aware of the impacts of food production on the environment and on agri-food systems. In addition, with the greater impact of climate change, this educational tool becomes even more relevant as it can offer concrete contributions to the mitigation of climate effects.

Since 2009, the Brazil-FAO International Cooperation Programme for School Meals, an alliance between the National Fund for Education Development (FNDE), the Brazilian Cooperation Agency (ABC) and the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), has been developing activities to strengthen and institutionalise school meal programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).

About 2 billion people in the world are overweight or obese due to a poor diet and sedentary lifestyle. Around 133.4 million Latin Americans and Caribbeans do not have access to a healthy diet. In addition, this region has the highest healthy food costs (LAC Food and Nutrition Security Overview, 2023).

Given this scenario, the cooperation has promoted actions aimed at offering healthy and adequate menus, public procurement from smallholder farming, improvement of school infrastructure and food and nutrition education actions such as school gardens, exchanges of experiences, training and technical visits between 26 LAC countries, within the framework of the Sustainable School Feeding Network (RAES).

2025 January

LM1 Part 1: What is Sustainability? (~1 hour)

Sustainability has many definitions that vary by discipline and culture. We provide here a few concepts that may help you.

Commonly, we think of achieving sustainability as human development that balances environment, society, and the economy in a way that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

Netukulimk is the Mi’kmaw (First Nations, Canada) concept for “the use of the natural bounty provided by the Creator for the self-support and well-being of the individual and the community at large.” In this case, community refers to the interconnectedness of all things—land, animals, water, human beings, plants, customs, laws. For Mi’kmaw, this understanding comes out of wejisqalia’timk, which means literally “we sprouted from the earth” and this speaks to the generations and generations of Mi’kmaw who have lived in Mi’kma’ki.  Sable, T. & Francis, B., 2012, p. 17.

These definitions are helpful to envision sustainability, but it becomes much more complex when we begin to dig into the details of how to achieve that.

Below are three videos (4-10 minutes) that help explain sustainability using natural science. The videos are from Sustainability Illustrated (where you will find many more!). The links here are for the English videos but are also available in French. Please, have a look at each one. There is some repetition, but that is good for learning!

1.1 Watch (~25 minutes)

Video 2: Four Principles of Sustainability (6:23). This video goes deeper into the principles introduced in video 1.
Video 3: Five Principles of Social Sustainability (8:37). This video explores the 4th principle related to social sustainability introduced in Video 1

1.2 Reflect (~20 minutes)

After watching the 3 videos above, reflect on the following questions. Remember that there are no “correct” answers to these questions, and your responses will likely change over time as you learn about sustainability.

1 – Describe sustainability. Use words appropriate as if you are explaining it to a colleague at work.

2 – What makes something (an action, a thing, a process) sustainable, or not sustainable?

3 – Describe the four principles of sustainability. Use words appropriate as if you are explaining it to a colleague at work.

4 – Describe the five principles of social sustainability. Use words appropriate as if you are explaining it to a colleague at work.

1.3 Keep Learning (optional)

1 – Discuss with colleagues about what sustainability means to them.

2 – If you enjoyed learning about sustainability using this lens and want a much more in-depth exploration, you could look at other resources and other ways of understanding sustainability before moving on:

  • Check out our list of Sustainability Courses. Most listed are free, but certificates and longer university courses often have fees attached, which we try to identify clearly in the links.
  • Have you heard of the” Triple Bottom Line?” watch this 4-minute video to understand how this framework can be helpful in expanding your ability to talk to others about sustainability.

Continue to LM1 Part 2. What are food systems? (~1.5 hours)

Return to the Learning Modules’ Main Page

This Toolkit is made to be used & shared - feel free!
Please cite the authors of the resources (and the ICDA SFS Toolkit if you can).


Feedback? Questions? Ideas? Contact the ICDA SFS Coordinator:
ICDAsfs.coordinator@acadiau.ca

updated 2024 December

LM1 Part 2: What are Food Systems? (~1.5 hours)

Food systems are complex and dynamic systems. In the Glossary you will find this definition used by Canadian Dietitians: “Food systems are complex, non-linear, systems… that embrace all the elements (environment, people, inputs, processes, infrastructure, institutions, markets, and trade) and activities …[of] production, processing, distribution, marketing, preparation, and consumption of food and the outputs of these activities, including socio-economic and environmental outcomes.”

Food systems are inseparable from the environment on which they depend, and the people who shape them. For example, Andean peoples, the Indigenous inhabitants of the Central Andes in South America, consider food systems to be deeply interconnected with their environment and cultural identity. Their agricultural practices, which have evolved over millennia, include paying tribute to Pachamama (Mother Earth), emphasizing sustainable land use and the relationship between the land, environment, and their culture. (Read more about Pachamama Day on the Cusco Peru website). Similarly, the Sámi, a group of people Indigenous to what is now called Europe, consider food and food systems as interconnected with broader cultural and geographic contexts. Tervo, et al. (2022) emphasize that … “…traditional Sami food and livelihoods relate to the natural environment and are part of their way of life; they are interlinked with the Sami people’s identity and dignity…”

Thinking of food systems as complex systems is very helpful in the context of sustainability.

2.1. Watch (4 minutes)

Start by watching the short video below to explore the concept of food systems.

Note that although waste is listed as a stage of the food system, food loss & waste happens at several stages of the food system.

Produced by No Line Communications What is a Food System? (youtube.com)

2.2. Read (1 hour)

In this section, we encourage you to read the Building Block “What are Food Systems” published online by TABLE. It is about 6 pages of content and should take less than an hour to read.

At the end of the document, you will find many “recommend resources” and “references” that you can explore. Note that a few of the links are outdated as of 2024, but many are still good.

What are Food Systems a Building Block from TABLE

2.3. Reflect (20 minutes)

After reading, reflect on the following questions.

1 – Describe a food system. Use words appropriate as if you were explaining it to a colleague at work.

2 – Why is it helpful to think of food systems as complex systems?

3 – Based on the videos and readings, how would you personally define a food system?

4 – Using the “Nourish Food System Map” from the reading as a guide, what roles do you have in the food system as an individual, and as a nutrition and dietetics professional?

2.4. Keep Learning (optional)

If you enjoyed learning about food systems as complex systems, you can check out the courses and readings:

  • The Indigenous Food Systems Network: This website includes various videos, stories, and tools related to Indigenous food sovereignty and sustainable food practices.

Continue to LM1 Part 3: Why are Food Systems (including dietary patterns) Currently not Sustainable (~1 hour)

Return to the Learning Modules’ Main Page

This Toolkit is made to be used & shared - feel free!
Please cite the authors of the resources (and the ICDA SFS Toolkit if you can).


Feedback? Questions? Ideas? Contact the ICDA SFS Coordinator:
ICDAsfs.coordinator@acadiau.ca

updated 2024 December

LM1 Part 3: Why are food systems (including dietary patterns) currently not sustainable? (~1 hour)

There are many food systems, and they could be thought of as subsystems to the larger complex system that you learned about in the previous section. Some aspects of food systems are more sustainable, and some are less sustainable. However, the overall outcomes (widespread malnutrition, food insecurity, and negative impacts) of food systems are not sustainable.

3.1. Watch (4 minutes)

Watch this short video from the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). It provides a very simple and visual outline of the social and environmental challenges that make our food systems unsustainable.

Why do we need to change our food system? (UNEP’s YouTube) (4 minutes)

3.2. Read (30 minutes)

You can explore the 9 ways food systems are failing humanity through the link to the UNEP or by reading below.

In the 1950s, the “Green Revolution” promoted synthetic seeds, fertilisers, and pesticides that prioritised quantity over quality, leading to widespread environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, human health issues, and deepening social inequality (see UNEP news article for details). In preparation for the landmark United Nations Food Systems Summit in September 2021 UNEP provided the following 9 things to know about the global food system.

  1. The global food system is not quite the bargain it seems.

The low retail cost of industrialized food can obscure its very high environmental price tag. According to some estimates, conventional agriculture – which produces greenhouse gas emissions, pollutes air and water, and destroys wildlife – costs the environment about $3 trillion every year (link to trucost.com). Externalized costs, such as the funds required to purify contaminated drinking water or to treat diseases related to poor nutrition, are also unaccounted for by the industry, meaning that communities and taxpayers may be picking up the tab without realizing it.

  1. The global food system can facilitate the spread of viruses from animals to humans.

While their genetic diversity provides animals with natural disease resistance, intensive livestock farming can produce genetic similarities within flocks and herds. This makes animals more susceptible to pathogens, and when they are kept in close proximity, viruses can then spread easily among them. Intensive livestock farming can also serve as a bridge for pathogens, allowing them to jump from wild animals to farm animals and then to humans.

  1. The global food system has been linked to zoonotic diseases.

Clearing forests to make space for agriculture and moving farms nearer to urban centres can destroy the natural buffers that protect humans from viruses circulating among wildlife. According to a United Nations Environment Programme assessment, climate change and the rising demand for animal protein are also affecting the emergence of what are known as zoonotic diseases – pathogens that can jump from animals to people and vice versa.

  1. The global food system fosters antimicrobial resistance.

In addition to preventing and treating disease, antimicrobials are commonly used to accelerate livestock growth. Over time, microorganisms develop resistance, making antimicrobials less effective as medicine. In fact, about 700,000 people die of resistant infections every year.  By 2050, those diseases may cause more deaths than cancer. According to the World Health Organization, antimicrobial resistance “threatens the achievements of modern medicine” and may precipitate “a post-antibiotic era, in which common infections and minor injuries can kill.”

  1. The global food system’s use of pesticides may be sickening people.

Large volumes of chemical fertilizers and pesticides are used to increase agricultural yields and humans may be exposed to these potentially-toxic pesticides through the food they consume, resulting in adverse health effects. Some pesticides have been proven to act as endocrine disruptors, potentially affecting reproductive functions, increasing the incidence of breast cancer, causing abnormal growth patterns and developmental delays in children, and altering immune function.

  1. The global food system contaminates water and soil and affects human health.

Agriculture plays a major role in pollution, releasing large volumes of manure, chemicals, antibiotics, and growth hormones into water sources. This poses risks to both aquatic ecosystems and human health. In fact, agriculture’s most common chemical contaminant, nitrate, can cause “blue baby syndrome”, which can kill infants.

  1. The global food system has been blamed for epidemics of obesity and chronic disease. 

Industrial agriculture produces mainly commodity crops, which are then used in a wide variety of inexpensive, calorie-dense, and widely available foods. Consequently, 60 per cent of all dietary energy is derived from just 3 cereal crops – rice, maize and wheat. Although it has effectively lowered the proportion of people suffering from hunger, this calorie-based approach fails to meet nutritional recommendations, such as those for the consumption of fruits, vegetables, and pulses. The popularity of processed, packaged, and prepared foods has increased in almost all communities. Worldwide, obesity is also on the rise and many suffer from preventable diseases often related to diet, like heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and some cancers.

Some 60 per cent of all dietary energy is derived from just 3 cereal crops – rice, maize and wheat. Photo by Johny Gorend/Unsplash

  1. The global food system is an inefficient use of land.

In spite of an insufficient global supply of pulses, fruits, and vegetables, livestock farming is ever more ubiquitous, perpetuating a self-sustaining cycle of supply and demand. Between 1970 and 2011, livestock increased from 7.3 billion to 24.2 billion units worldwide, with about 60 per cent of all agricultural land used for grazing. Meanwhile, while there may be fewer people in the world who are undernourished, there are many more people who are now malnourished.

Intensive livestock farming can also serve as a bridge for pathogens, allowing them to jump from wild animals to farm animals and then to humans. Photo by Nighthawk Shoots/Unsplash

  1. The global food system entrenches inequality.

Although small farms make up 72 per cent of all farms, they occupy just 8 per cent of all agricultural land.  In contrast, large farms – which account for only 1 per cent of the world’s farms – occupy 65 per cent of agricultural land.  This gives large farms disproportionate control, and there is little incentive to develop technologies that could benefit resource-poor small-hold farmers, including those in developing countries. At the other end of the food supply chain, food that is affordable to the poor may be energy-dense but is often nutrient-poor. Micronutrient deficiencies may impair cognitive development, lower resistance to disease, increase risks during childbirth and, ultimately, affect economic productivity. The poor are effectively disadvantaged both as producers and consumers.

3.3. Reflect (20 minutes)

After watching the video and reading this chapter, reflect on the following questions.

  1. Describe how climate change is impacting food systems, and how food systems are impacting climate change.
  2. Describe how food systems (including human diets) are impacting, and are impacted by 2-3 other environmental challenges (e.g., biodiversity).
  3. Describe how food systems (including human diets) are impacting social sustainability. If needed, review the “Five Principles of Sustainability” video above. For example, how do they impact human health and inequality?
  4. With natural resources under pressure, how can individual consumers and communities contribute to preserving these resources through their food choices?
  5. Try and think of two ways that the challenges you described above (in questions 1-3) are directly impacting your community.

3.4. Keep Learning (optional)

If you want to keep exploring the ways that food systems are unsustainable, we recommend you read Foodsource Chapter 1: Overview of Food System Challenges. It is about 25 pages and takes about 1 hour to read.

You can also filter for “Personal Knowledge Development” in the Existing Resources Database.

Or, you can begin with the following resources in this Toolkit:

Continue to LM1 Part 4: What is a healthy and sustainable dietary pattern (~30 minutes)

Return to the Learning Modules’ Main Page

This Toolkit is made to be used & shared - feel free!
Please cite the authors of the resources (and the ICDA SFS Toolkit if you can).


Feedback? Questions? Ideas? Contact the ICDA SFS Coordinator:
ICDAsfs.coordinator@acadiau.ca

updated 2024 December

LM1 Part 5: Summary of Learning Module 1 (~20 minutes)

In this first Learning Module, you explored resources in the toolkit to learn about and answer 4 questions that are summarised below:

LM 1 Part 1: What is sustainability?

Overall, the module aims to comprehensively introduce sustainability, its principles, and practical applications. The concept of sustainability invites us to consider food, nutrition, and health in the context of our relationship with the environment, society, economy, and with both current and future generations.

Sustainability is defined broadly, but its implementation varies across disciplines and cultures. For example, the Mi’kmaw concept of Netukulimk emphasizes reliance on nature to support yourself and your community while also contributing to and protecting nature—highlighting the interconnectedness of all things, including land, animals, water, and human beings.

The United Nations employs variations of the Brundtland definition of sustainable development, which describes human development that balances the environment, society, and economy in a way that meets present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own.

These definitions are helpful to envision sustainability but they can be challenging to put into practice without more guidance. The Framework for Strategic Sustainable Development, which underpins the videos in this section, emphasise that in order to achieve sustainability, there are myriad opportunities, as long as one does not violate eight sustainability principles important to our socioecological systems.

LM1 Part 2: What are food systems?

Food systems are complex, interconnected networks of actors and factors that encompass all aspects of food production, distribution, and consumption. This includes important roles played by economic structures, political systems, health systems, and human sociocultural systems.

Source: Nourish

Food systems are inseparable from the environment on which they depend, and the people who shape them. Indigenous food systems, like those of the Andean peoples and the Sámi, highlight the deep connections between food systems, culture, and sustainability.

Viewing food systems as complex is essential for addressing sustainability challenges, as it emphasises the need for a holistic approach that considers environmental soundness, economic viability, and social justice.

Individuals can reflect on their roles within these networks to engage effectively with food systems and incorporate systems thinking into their practices. Actions include learning from sustainable practices from Indigenous food systems, analysing food loss and waste at multiple stages in food systems, advocating for collaboration between various food systems actors and factors, and continuously learning about dynamic food systems.

By recognising the interconnections within food systems and collaborating across disciplines, we can better address human health and environmental conservation issues.

LM1 Part 3: Why are current food systems, including dietary patterns, not sustainable?

Industrialized food systems are unsustainable, yet they dominate globally. Present food systems frequently offer products that compromise both human and environmental health.

These systems fail to nourish everyone adequately or equitably, as evidenced by high malnutrition rates (which include overweight, underweight, and/or micronutrient deficiencies at any weight) and contribute to non-communicable diseases, often concentrated among specific populations, although they can impact anyone.

The foods typically provided by current food systems are often highly processed and calorie-dense, lacking the variety and nutritional density needed for a healthy dietary pattern balanced from all the food groups. Furthermore, current food systems have significant food loss and waste at every stage, which is an inefficient use of our resources. These resources could be better utilised to nourish people or animals instead of going to landfills and contributing to greenhouse gases.

The resources our food systems depend on – soil, water, air, flora, fungi, fauna, and humans – face increasing pressures that further threaten our food systems. Ironically, food systems are major drivers of such pressure. Global industrial food systems have been shaped by the Green Revolution which emphasises quantity over quality, depends on fossil fuels for synthetic fertility, chemicals, plastics, and energy, and clears large swaths of land for mono-culture agriculture.

This approach carries hidden costs, including pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity loss, and related health issues. These hidden costs include health risks for agricultural workers and the public like antimicrobial resistance, pesticide toxicity, and the spread of zoonotic diseases. Unfortunately, these costs are not reflected in food prices or in the decision-making processes governing food systems. Moreover, entrenched inequities in land distribution and access to other resources marginalise smallholder farmers, perpetuating disparities.

Understanding how current industrial food systems systematically contribute to unsustainable conditions for individuals, communities, and the environment enables practitioners to grasp the full scope of the challenges and identify potential solutions. Recognizing the intricate connections between food systems, health, climate change, biodiversity, and social equity underscores the necessity of adopting systemic and holistic approaches to address these issues effectively.

LM 1 Part 4: What is a healthy and sustainable dietary pattern?

Sustainable dietary patterns support environmental and human health for everyone in current and future generations while respecting biodiversity, cultural traditions, and affordability. A sustainable dietary pattern varies across cultures, communities, and individuals, reflecting diverse needs and practices. The FAO’s “Guiding Principles for Sustainable, Healthy Diets” provides a list of sixteen key principles summarized here:

Source: WHO.int
  • Human health starts with exclusive breastfeeding from 0-6 months of age, then continuing for 2 years while consuming a variety of minimally processed foods. Sustainable diets are: high in whole grains, tubers, fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts; moderate amounts of oilseeds and animal products; adequate in safe drinking water; and low in highly refined processed foods, especially those with added refined sugars, refined fats, salt, and alcohol.
  • Environmentally sustainable dietary patterns source foods from systems that have low greenhouse gas emissions and avoid resource overuse and abuse such as fossil fuels, deforestation, biodiversity loss, and food loss and waste – considering every stage of the system from production, processing, preparation, and consumption back to production again.
  • Socially sustainable dietary patterns respect local traditions and gender dynamics while remaining accessible, equitable, and desirable.

Putting these sixteen principles into practice means selecting foods from agroecological organic systems as often as possible with foods balanced across the food groups (primarily from plants, trees, and fungi with a smaller amount from animals).

Consideration of the types of animal foods, in addition to the system that the food comes from, is important for both the planet and people. Red and processed meats should be used sparingly, approximately once a week; chicken, eggs, and dairy a few times a week; and insects and aquatic animals more frequently (with some exceptions such as fish that are on ‘red lists’).

Other sustainable actions can include choosing from fresh, locally available foods to create meals that are delicious, meaningful, and enjoyed with friends and family; reducing food waste by planning meals, using leftovers, and returning byproducts to the food system, such as composting; avoiding plastics and other fossil fuel products; using sustainable energy sources for cooking, processing, and transporting foods and equipment needed for the food system; and if possible, participating in or starting local food councils to create and advocate for sustainable food systems.

Countries are encouraged to adapt these principles to their unique contexts, balancing nutritional, environmental, and socio-cultural factors.

Ready to continue with Learning Module 2: How are Sustainable Food Systems (including Dietary Patterns) Relevant to Nutrition and Dietetic Practice?

Alternatively, return to the Learning Modules’ Main Page

This Toolkit is made to be used & shared - feel free!
Please cite the authors of the resources (and the ICDA SFS Toolkit if you can).


Feedback? Questions? Ideas? Contact the ICDA SFS Coordinator:
ICDAsfs.coordinator@acadiau.ca

updated 2024 December

Sustainable healthy diets: guiding principles (2019)

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) jointly held an international expert consultation on Sustainable and Healthy Diets from 1 to 3 July 2019 at FAO headquarters in Rome, Italy. The Consultation agreed on guiding principles for what constitutes “Sustainable Healthy Diets”, which comes when the debate around the sustainability of diets is high on the agenda of governments, international organisations, civil society organisations, the private sector and academia.

Considering the detrimental environmental impact of current food systems, and the concerns raised about their sustainability, there is an urgent need to promote diets that are healthy and have low environmental impacts. These diets also need to be socio-culturally acceptable and economically accessible for all.

These guiding principles take a holistic approach to diets; they consider international nutrition recommendations; the environmental cost of food production and consumption; and the adaptability to local social, cultural and economic contexts. At the consultation, the experts agreed on the term “Sustainable Healthy Diets” which encompasses the two dimensions – sustainability and healthiness of diets. Countries should decide on the trade-offs according to their situations and goals.

These guiding principles emphasize the role of food consumption and diets in contributing to the achievement of the Sustatinable Development Goals (SDGs) at the country level, especially SDGs:
1 No Poverty
2 Zero Hunger
3 Good Health and Well-Being
4 Quality Education
5 Gender Equality
12 Responsible Consumption and Production
13 Climate Action

Also see our ICDA SFS Toolkit’s SDG Briefs: Dietitian-Nutritionist Roles that includes D-N Roles for SDG 4, 5, 12, and 13 above as well as:
6 Clean water and sanitation
8 Decent work and economic growth
14 Life below water
15 Life on land

2025 January


Analysis: U.S. Lags Behind Other G20 Nations at Adding Sustainability Into Dietary Guidelines (2023)

Rifkin, J. (2023). U.S. lags behind other G20 nations at adding sustainability into dietary guidelines. Center for Biological Diversity. https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/population_and_sustainability/pdfs/g20-dietary-guidelines-analysis.pdf

The Center for Biological Diversity released an analysis of the dietary guidelines of the G20 countries that found the United States has fallen behind in including sustainability. The analysis found that most G20 nations include sustainability goals and recommendations to reduce meat and/or increase plant-based foods. But the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, also known as the DGA, does not consider dietary impacts on the environment or recommend reduced meat consumption, though animal agriculture is a major driver of climate change and biodiversity loss.

While G20 nations have taken the lead, fewer than half of national dietary guidelines around the world include environmental sustainability. But that number has been rapidly growing over the past 10 years, with an increase in recommendations to reduce meat consumption and an emphasis on plant-based diets. Aligning dietary guidelines with sustainability goals is particularly important in G20 countries, where the current per capita consumption of meat and dairy is higher than the global average.